What Is RAG? Connecting Company Documents to an AI Assistant

Web Görsel
What Is RAG and Why Is It Needed?
LLMs know their training data but not your corporate manual. RAG — Retrieval-Augmented Generation — first retrieves relevant passages from your company documents, then asks the LLM to "answer in light of these passages." You build AI that stays current without fine-tuning.
Typical Use Cases
- Internal help desk: HR policies, IT procedures
- Customer support: product manuals, FAQs, contracts
- Sales enablement: spec sheets, competitor comparisons, pricing
- Legal and regulation: statutes, case law search
Architecture: 6 Components
- Document ingestion: Pulling from PDF, DOCX, Markdown, SharePoint, Notion, Google Drive
- Chunking: Splitting documents into 200-800 token semantically coherent pieces
- Embedding: Each chunk → vector (OpenAI text-embedding-3, Cohere, BGE-M3)
- Vector DB: Postgres + pgvector, Qdrant, Weaviate
- Retrieval: Embed the question, find N nearest chunks
- Generation: Prompt the LLM to answer using retrieved chunks
Seven Rules for Quality RAG
- Hybrid search: Combine semantic + keyword (BM25)
- Re-ranking: Take top 20, re-rank to 5 with Cohere Rerank
- Chunk context: Add title + preceding paragraph summary to each chunk
- Metadata filtering: Pre-filter by department, date, ACL
- Cite sources: Show which document backed the answer — critical for trust
- Permission to say "I don''t know": Instruct the LLM not to fabricate when evidence is missing
- Evaluation pipeline: 100 Q&A golden set, regression tested on every change
Hybrid Search: BM25 + Semantic
Pure embedding search fails for certain queries. If a user asks about "SKU-4782-A", semantic embedding won''t match; BM25 (keyword) will. Hybrid approach:
- BM25 → top 50
- Embedding → top 50
- RRF (Reciprocal Rank Fusion) to combine
- Re-rank with Cohere or cross-encoder to top 5
Chunk Strategies
| Type | Size | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Small | 100-300 tokens | Exact-answer FAQ, short definitions |
| Medium | 300-800 tokens | Technical doc paragraphs — most common |
| Large | 800-1500 tokens | Long-context narrative/guides |
| Page-based | PDF page | Legal, table-heavy |
Practical Stack (SMB Scale)
- Embedding: OpenAI text-embedding-3-small (cheap, strong multilingual)
- Vector DB: PostgreSQL + pgvector (no separate service)
- LLM: Claude Haiku or GPT-4o-mini
- Framework: LangChain or LlamaIndex — or a 200-line custom implementation
- Frontend: Next.js with streaming responses
Security and Permissions
Biggest RAG mistake: every user sees all documents. Solution: attach acl metadata to each chunk; filter at retrieval by role. Managers see salary policies, others don''t.
Evaluation Set
Most skipped step. A good RAG system needs:
- 100 golden Q&A pairs (human-labeled)
- Automated metrics: retrieval precision@5, recall@10
- LLM-as-judge: answer quality 1-5
- Regression: same set runs on every model/prompt change
- Feedback loop: hard queries from production logs added weekly
Cost
For 10,000 pages of corporate documents, initial indexing ~$10. Monthly 5,000 queries: LLM + embeddings total ~$50-100. Staff time savings usually 20-50x that.
Frequently Asked Questions
pgvector vs dedicated vector DB?
Under 10M chunks: pgvector is sufficient with no additional ops burden. Over 10M or high QPS: Qdrant/Weaviate recommended.
How to do multilingual RAG?
Multilingual embedding (Cohere embed-multilingual-v3 or BGE-M3) + language-specific BM25 tokenizer.
Can RAG replace fine-tuning?
For knowledge-based use cases, yes. For style/tone adaptation, fine-tuning still helps. Often used together.
Next Step
Set up RAG for your organization — book a technical call.
Yorumlar (0)
Bu konuda yardima mi ihtiyaciniz var?
Ekibimiz, projenize en uygun cozumleri sunmak icin hazir.
Iletisime Gecin